【佳學(xué)基因檢測】胰腺癌液體活檢之循環(huán)腫瘤DNA(ctDNA)基因檢測
1948年,Mandel和Metais報道了人類血液中存在無細(xì)胞核酸片段的證據(jù)。值得注意的是,早在1977年,León及其同事就對癌癥患者的循環(huán)DNA發(fā)表了有趣的聲明。細(xì)胞外DNA,也稱為循環(huán)游離DNA(cfDNA),包括從細(xì)胞釋放的細(xì)胞核和/或線粒體DNA,存在于各種生理循環(huán)液中。腫瘤細(xì)胞釋放的cfDNA通常稱為ctDNA,是癌癥的高度特異性標(biāo)志物?;蚪獯a研究表明,ctDNA通常攜帶胰腺導(dǎo)管腺癌(PDAC)組織中常見的致癌突變,涉及基因,如Kristen大鼠肉瘤(KRAS)、細(xì)胞周期依賴性激酶抑制劑2A(CDKN2A)、腫瘤蛋白53(TP53)和SMAD家族成員4(SMAD4)/Delete in Pancrec Cancer-4(DPC4)。值得注意的是,根據(jù)基因檢測大數(shù)據(jù)機(jī)構(gòu)佳學(xué)基因的統(tǒng)計,在可檢測到ctDNA的胰腺導(dǎo)管腺癌(PDAC)病例中,分別有超過90%和73%的病例到KRAS突變或p53失活。
各種技術(shù),如等位基因特異性聚合酶鏈反應(yīng)(PCR)、數(shù)字PCR(dPCR)、液滴數(shù)字PCR(ddPCR)、珠乳液擴(kuò)增磁學(xué)(BEAMing)和下一代測序(NGS),可用于檢測液體活檢(LB)樣本中的ctDNA。雖然檢測ctDNA可能帶來挑戰(zhàn),但結(jié)合各種技術(shù)可以提高這一過程的正確性和效率。
一些研究發(fā)現(xiàn),與胰腺神經(jīng)內(nèi)分泌腫瘤或CP患者相比,從胰腺導(dǎo)管腺癌(PDAC)患者中檢測到的cfDNA水平更高,并且與較差的疾病特異性生存率有關(guān)。在胰腺導(dǎo)管腺癌(PDAC)患者ctDNA檢測到的所有突變基因中,KRAS是賊常見的(50-90%)。雖然突變也可以在健康對照和CP患者中發(fā)現(xiàn),但其突變水平在胰腺導(dǎo)管腺癌(PDAC)中明顯更高。 在他們的綜述中,朱和他的同事強(qiáng)調(diào),雖然ctDNA的靈敏度略低于CTC,但ctDNA提供了更高的特異性。值得注意的是,雖然ctDNA的檢測被認(rèn)為適用于診斷胰腺導(dǎo)管腺癌(PDAC),但并不適合篩查。ctDNA在早期胰腺導(dǎo)管腺癌(PDAC)中的靈敏度有限,這是由于該階段細(xì)胞壞死極少,導(dǎo)致只有少量ctDNA釋放到外周血液中。
Table 1:Comparison between biomarkers of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma ctDNA
Target | KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4, BRAF, PIK3CA, ADAMTS1, BNC1, 5MC, H2AZ, H2A1.1, H3K4me2, h2ak119ub | CD45, CEP8, CK, EpCAM |
KRAS, TP53, RNA: miRNA, longRNA Proteins markers: EFGR, EPCAM, MUC-1, GPC-1, WNT2 |
Isolation | Blood | Blood | Body fluids |
Tumor information | Epigenetic information | DNA, RNA, Protein | DNA, RNA, Protein |
Technological approaches | qPCR, dPCR, ddPCR, NGS, commercial kits | Immunoaffinity, Physical methods (size and density) | Density-based, size-based, affinity-based, commercial kits |
Advantages |
qPCR: Fast and low-cost dPCR: High sensitivity/Specificity NGS: capability to screen for a broad range of genetic variants using high DNA input |
Immunoaffinity: Specific, label-free obtained Physical methods: Fast, simple, Low-cost, label-free obtained |
Density-based: low cost. Independent of marker expression. Size-based: Low-cost, fast, Independent of marker expression. Affinity-based: Specificity. High purity. Commercial kits: Simple, fast. |
Disadvantages |
General: No early stages qPCR: Low sensitivity. Only points mutations. dPCR: High cost. Only points mutations. NGS: Variable sensitivity. High cost. |
General: Isolation complex and expensive. Technical variability Immunoaffinity: capture only one subpopulation. Low purity. Physical methods: Needs immuno-labeling techniques to distinguish CTCs |
General: Isolation complex by contamination and expensive Density-based: Time, high volume sample, can damage EVs. Size based: contamination. Affinity-based: low sample yield. Commercial kits: High cost. |
Sensitivity (S) (%) |
34–71% KRAS mutations: codons 12, 13, 61, in different stages. |
73–76% CD45/CEP8 100% Mt, 58% resectable Anti-EpCAM portal vein Blood |
67% ES, 80% LA, 85% Mt KRAS mutations in exoDNA 50% ES GPC1 miRNAs Increased expression |
Specificity (Sp) (%) |
75–81% Mutations KRAS exon 2 |
68% CD45/CEP8 |
90% ES GPC1 |
Combined techniques (%) |
S: 85–98%, Sp: 77–81% ctDNA (KRAS exon 2) with CA19.9 S: 47% ctDNA (KRAS MAFs) with CA19.9 |
S: 100%, Sp: 80% CTCs.with EVs |
NR |
Application |
No suitable for screening of PDAC Monitoring postoperative minimal residual disease Predictor of disease recurrence and prognosis |
Not present in healthy controls Variable sensitivity in early diagnosis Excellent specificity. Follow-up of disease recurrence and prognosis Functional analysis drug resistance |
The highest sensitivity and specificity in early detection Evaluated response of resection or any therapy Biotherapeutic application |
CTCs | EVs |
---|
BEAMing: beads-emulsion-amplification-magnetics; CEP8: chromosome 8 centromere; ctDNA: circulating tumor DNA; CTC: circulating tumor cells; dPCR: digital polymerase chain reaction; ddPCR: droplet digital PCR; EpCAM: epithelial cell adhesion molecule; ES: early stages; EVs: extracellular vesicles; GPC1: glypican-1; LA: locally advanced; miRNA: micro-RNA; Mt: metastatic; NGS: next-generation sequencing; NR: not reported.
支持本文的科學(xué)文獻(xiàn)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10855073/
(責(zé)任編輯:佳學(xué)基因)